Betta SE Solar Powered Automatic Robotic Pool

(2 customer reviews)

This product is currently out of stock and unavailable.

Compare
SKU: 3256806595632492 Categories: , , , ,

Description

About this item

  • Utilizes 100% solar power to automatically and continually clean the surface of the water, removing debris such as animal hairs, leaves, dust, pollen, and dead insects. Equipped with four water depth bumper rods, it uses ultrasonic radar to sense obstacles and reroute itself to ensure the entire pool is cleaned.
  • Equipped with re-engineered twin Salt Chlorine Tolerant (SCT) Motors to drive the propellers directly, making it more reliable, responsive, and energy efficient. This innovative technology ensures excellent cleaning performance in both freshwater and saltwater pools.
  • Features a large fine-mesh debris basket with a top handle, making it easy to clean without having to remove the Betta from the water. Simply dock it, open the cover, and remove the basket for easy debris disposal.
  • Outfitted with special UV resistant coating and material that protects it from damages caused by ultraviolet radiation from the sun.
  • Comes with a 1-year warranty, allowing you to stop manually cleaning the pool and instead, enjoy your pool without the hassle of long cables getting in the way. Note: Betta SE needs a minimum of 5 inches of water to operate. It is not compatible with infinity pools.

Additional information

Ships From

United States

Brand Name

XMSJ

2 reviews for Betta SE Solar Powered Automatic Robotic Pool

  1. Klemens Totleben

    I was skeptical because reviews seemed faked and they sent me the wrong tracking number initially. But it arrived within the window. New product and has warranty card. Communication could have been better, but I think it was the extreme time difference.

  2. Jaqueline Phipps

    I was skeptical because reviews seemed faked and they sent me the wrong tracking number initially. But it arrived within the window. New product and has warranty card. Communication could have been better, but I think it was the extreme time difference.

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *